Hi Ralf,
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 18:07 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> OK. Here's a stripped-down case that tries to replicate your situation.
> It does not fail for me, and I think it's portable (to non-w32 hosts
> that support dlopen(); I did not use libltdl in this case; and I did
> use one int
Hi Ralph,
Sorry to be a pain, but again, more questions .. :)
On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 02:30 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> I forgot the main part of the answer, sorry. You wrote:
> >> The reason I need this capability is to ensure that all the symbols from
> >> lib1 and lib2 are available to any
Hi Ralph,
Thanks for the quick response. Some follow-up questions:
On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 02:25 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Reid,
>
> Yes. Generic position-dependent linker flags are not implemented at
> this point.
Okay :)
> If you control lib1 and lib2 though (i.e., they are built
s, help, or pointers would be very welcome. BTW, this is for
use with both the LLVM ( http://llvm.org/ ) and HLVM
( http://hlvm.org/ ) projects.
Reid Spencer
http://reidspencer.com/
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
