ce, I'd like to hear
from them what they think about something like this.
Thoughts, comments?
Rainer
--
-----
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
___
Olaf Weber writes:
> As far as I can tell they should have defaulted to mips4 N32 -- at
> least when running IRIX 6.5 -- this is going by what the
> to-be-installed /etc/compiler.defaults says. But the R8Ks were weird
> beasts at the best of times.
This is true with IRIX 6.5, but was different w
Olaf Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IIRC gcc 2.x defaults to o32 (and cannot do otherwise) while gcc 3.x
> defaults to n32. You switch using options like '-mabi=64'.
Wrong: GCC 2.x for IRIX 6 defaults to N32 (with N64 support available) and
cannot support O32 without hacks (like configuring
Robert,
> IMHO it isn't worth the bother to allow both, I'll just revert patch.
> Everyone agree?
certainly :-) If the difference in shlib version numbering between
Solaris/Linux and IRIX is really a FAQ that causes user confusion, perhaps
this should be documented?
Rainer
___
an already hear the outcry from affected users and admins; I don't want
to be in the position to explain to them that their applications had to be
broken for cosmetic reasons and consistency with other platforms.
Rainer
---------
lation
time. This cannot really be intended?
Rainer
---------
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.
-release binary
I had was claimed to work on V5.0 and V5.0A, too, although this is not
supported.
Since the V5.1 loader is said to be a full rewrite, this will never make it
into V4.0.
Rainer
--
-----
Rainer Orth, Facul
