On 2011-06-17 Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 6/16/2011 2:50 PM, Lasse Collin wrote:
> > Major:minor:revision is easier to understand than
> > current:revision:age,
>
> Major:minor:revision artificially entangles package release numbering
> with API/ABI changes. Typically wh
On 2011-06-14 Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Lasse Collin wrote:
> >http://www.openbsd.org/faq/ports/specialtopics.html
>
> If this web page text is correct, then I agree that libtool is doing
> the wrong thing for OpenBSD. But of course we should search fo
On 2011-06-14 Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Lasse Collin wrote:
> > Please read the section "Understanding shared libraries
> > number rules" (it's short):
> >
> >http://www.openbsd.org/faq/ports/specialtopics.html
>
> If
perating systems.
> There are also long-standing traditions associated with various OSs.
Could you elaborate? Could the traditions explain why on some operating
systems Libtool does library versioning in a way that conflicts with the
operating system documentation?
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011,
operating system
specific docs long time ago.
--
Lasse Collin | IRC: Larhzu @ IRCnet & Freenode
___
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
eatingandusinglibraries.htm
IRIX:
http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/tpl/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi/0650/bks/SGI_Developer/books/MproCplrDbx_TG/sgi_html/ch03.html#Z50766
--
Lasse Collin | IRC: Larhzu @ IRCnet & Freenode
___
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
