Alexandre> objects, unless the PIC objects aren't available.
>
> I agree here. I think convenience libraries need to compile two sets
> of libraries: *.a which contains non-PIC code and *.al which contains
> PIC code.
And they need to be installed so they are usable by o
Alexandre Oliva writes:
> On Feb 14, 2001, Jeremy Slade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It seems that what I really what is to create swigShapeUtils.sl
> > using the original ../../lib/*.lo files build earlier (and used to
> > create libShapeUtils.sl), rather than
Tom Tromey writes:
> >>>>> "Jeremy" == Jeremy Slade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jeremy> What I really want to build is 'swigShapeUtils.sl', which
> Jeremy> corresponds to the swigShapeUtils.pm module. But automake
> Jerem
ibShapeUtils.la plus the .libs/libShapeUtils.a and
.libs/libShapeUtils.sl, etc. So, how do I get it to build my
swigShapeUtils.sl linked against the libShapeUtils.a archive lib, so
there is not that run-time dependency on libShapeUtils.sl?
Perhaps I'm going about this the wrong way. Please enlighten m
