lm}
> > ar cru @value{objdir}/libhello.a foo.o hello.o
> > ranlib @value{objdir}/libhello.a
> > @@ -650,7 +661,7 @@ a23$
> > Now, let's try the same trick on the shared library platform:
> >
> > @example
> > -
+ r .LC0
+ r .LC1
+ U _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_
+ T __i686.get_pc_thunk.bx
U cos
T foo
a foo.c
%%%
Regards,
--
Jeremie LE HEN aka TtZ/TataZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt; calls.
>
> I agree as well. However, as over time the contents of the files may be
> extended, we should not limit ourselves to what they contain.
> Otherwise, good idea.
The previous patch adds a small paragraph at th
Hi Ralf,
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 05:02:46PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Jeremie LE HEN wrote on Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 03:29:55PM CEST:
> >
> > > Your documentation points are valid, thanks. We should work on that.
> >
> > You are welcome, I can update
s that 1.5.18 will bomb out in some cases
> (when given an "unknown" compiler name) where Debian-1.5.6 won't.. let's
> see.
Thank you for this clear explanation. However, could you tell me a
little bit more on the --tag option, I can't see anything in the
documenta
work, and upgrading a package in it is,
unfortunately, a heavy process, especially when the package is still
not released by the Debian maintainer) ? If there isn't, I would send
a notice to the Debian maintainer to let him know about this bug.
Thanks again.
Best regards,
--
Jeremie LE HEN ak
mp;& ln -s ../libsitalibs.la libsitalibs.la)
%%%
As you can see, no command is issued when I'm trying to build
libsitalibs.a with libtool-1.5.6. (Note that I have recently added the
"-static" argument, while trying to make libtool-1.5 behave correctly).
Thank you.
Regards,
--
Jer
.4, but since I upgraded to libtool-1.5, I can't
build a static library any more. I gave a try to the Changelog, but it
is too heavy, IMO.
Thank you.
Regards,
--
Jeremie LE HEN aka TtZ/TataZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
