-06 at 17:15, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Ian Peters writes:
>
> > Yes, the end goal is to have all of the libraries between the -Bstatic
> > and -Bdynamic linked statically, while keeping a dynamic binary against
> > libc and ld-linux.
>
> You do realize that this goal can
On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 02:21, Tim Van Holder wrote:
> On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 07:14, Ian Peters wrote:
> > Unfortunately, with libtool 1.4.x, I get this instead (after a much,
> > much longer time):
> >
> > gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wunused -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissin
1.4 and 1.4.2.
--
Ian Peters
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 02:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 01:14:52AM -0400, Ian Peters wrote:
> > Conspicuously missing are the linker directives to be passed to gcc,
> > namely -Wl,-Bstatic and -Wl,-Bdynamic. I do this to produce a binary
> > that
documented change in behaviour?
If so, is there some other way to accomplish the same goal?
--
Ian Peters
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
I'm not sure what kind of list this is (I found the information at
www.gnu.org/directory/libtool.html), so I'm not currently subscribed.
Please either send me subscription information, or CC me on replies.
Thanks!
--
Ian Peters
[EMAIL
