Re: Status of availability of features which allow correct and seamless support of DLLs in current GNU-Win32 releases

2000-05-01 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 21:18:58 +0300 From: Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> O, I used to ask Mumit Khan why he distributes such outdated, 19990818 binutils for mingw32, and got answer that there's bad attitudes of binutils maintainers towards pe frontend. Now, when officia

Re: Can't build with cc on Solaris

2000-04-03 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
From: Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 03 Apr 2000 02:35:33 -0300 binutils top-level configure passes --with-gnu-ld down to sub-projects `configure' commands whenever it finds `ld' is going to be built. I think that is a bug. If you are doing a one-tree build with the binut

Re: State of win32 dll support in libtool at CVS

2000-03-31 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 23:29:46 +0300 From: Paul Sokolovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Shared DLLs Building:require special support doesn't require special support (namely, building with PIC) (are built from the same

[ian@zembu.com: Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am]

2000-03-10 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 10 Mar 2000 13:22:19 -0800 From: Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Subject: Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile

Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am

2000-03-10 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 16:52:32 +0100 From: Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |> Executing a shell script does use a bit more memory, but only just |> enough for "/bin/sh" and the name of the script to execute. If that |> is pushing H.J. over the memory limit, then he must have b

Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am

2000-03-10 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 23:10:39 +0100 From: Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |>Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 11:50:59 -0800 |>From: "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |> |>I know t

Re: [PATCH]: A new one for ld/Makefile.am

2000-03-10 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 20:50:34 -0800 From: "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It was my mistake. It works. Here is a new patch for ld/Makefile.am. Any objections? 2000-03-09 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Makefile.am (stmp-run-ld): New target. (all-am): Depen

Re: [PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am

2000-03-09 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 11:50:59 -0800 From: "H . J . Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I know this patch doesn't look very clean. But I don't know automake well enough to make it better. Here is the problem I am trying to fix. I got: # /work/ia64/bin/cygnus/2303/gcc/xgcc -B/usr/ia64-