Re: About libtool supporting parallel "make install"

On Fri 18 Mar 2011 07:40, Ralf Wildenhues writes: > * Dan Nicholson wrote on Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:47:38PM CET: >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> >> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644896#c2 >> >> This seems more legitimate. I looked at the Makefile.am's

Re: How does one specify linking to 64 bit libraries when there is a choice?

Hi Bruce, Sorry you and others have had to suffer through this. On Mon 20 Dec 2010 15:09, Bruce Korb writes: > How much understanding of the machinery should be expected > of the hapless project builder? I'm not sure, but: > Nelson has been doing this stuff for quite a while and has > rea

Re: How does one specify linking to 64 bit libraries when there is a choice?

Hello, When a work subscription to libtool and a home subscription to guile-devel collide... On Mon 20 Dec 2010 05:40, Noah Lavine writes: > I found the file that pkg-config will be using to give you this > information. It is meta/guile-.pc in my Guile source > tree. Furthermore, I think it's s

Re: lt_dlerror 'file not found' bug

Hello Matěj, On Sun 13 Dec 2009 22:45, Matěj Týč writes: > The story is that if you try to lt_dlopen a module that can't be > dlopened (for example when it has unsatisfied dependencies), the > lt_dlopen function will return null module handle. > If you want to know where is the problem, you usua

uninstalled modules do not build .so files

Hi, So, this is a resend, as for some reason the silliest of autotools projects creates 300 kB tarballs. Attaching the files individually: unpack in a directory of their own please. *** Unpack the attached tarball (it will create its own directory). It is a standard autotooled project with one f

Re: fixing linkage against uninstalled libtool archives on macos?

Hi Ralf, On Mon 17 Nov 2008 20:29, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | # Whether or not to build static libraries. > | -build_old_libs=yes > | +build_old_libs=no > > Huh? Did you rerun configure with --disable-static? > > | -LTCFLAGS="-I/opt/yobuild/include -g -O0" > | +LTCFLAGS="-I

Re: fixing linkage against uninstalled libtool archives on macos?

Hi Ralf, Thanks for the debugging. On Thu 13 Nov 2008 21:46, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Andy Wingo wrote on Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:41:15AM CET: >> >> > >> >> >>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2008-11/msg00012.htm

Re: fixing linkage against uninstalled libtool archives on macos?

Hi Ralf, On Wed 12 Nov 2008 21:37, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Andy Wingo wrote on Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:04:09AM CET: >> On Tue 11 Nov 2008 20:11, Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > On 11-Nov-08, at 6:16 AM, Andy Wingo wrote:

Re: fixing linkage against uninstalled libtool archives on macos?

Hi Peter, On Tue 11 Nov 2008 20:11, Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 11-Nov-08, at 6:16 AM, Andy Wingo wrote: > >>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2008-11/msg00012.html >> >> Just to recap, the bug is that having >> "

fixing linkage against uninstalled libtool archives on macos?

Hi, I posted a message to bug-libtool that hasn't gotten a response: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2008-11/msg00012.html In short, "libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc ... /path/to/libfoo.la" does not do the right thing on Mac OS with libtool 2.2.6a. Can I get confirmation of th