[sr #111195] Include libtool-next-version in the libtool distribution

Update of sr #95 (group libtool): Status:None => Done Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #6: [comment #5 comment #5:] >> the formatting of libtool.tex

[sr #111195] Include libtool-next-version in the libtool distribution

Follow-up Comment #5, sr #95 (group libtool): > the formatting of libtool.texi for when newlines are used. The placement of newlines was intentional: For 1-2 years now, in documentation, I use "semantic newlines": https://lists.gnu.org/r/help-texinfo/2023-05/msg6.html https://lists.gnu.o

[sr #111195] Include libtool-next-version in the libtool distribution

Follow-up Comment #4, sr #95 (group libtool): [comment #3 comment #3:] > Here's a proposed patch that adds the libtool-next-version program to the > libtool package, including documentation. Thank you for the patch file! It looks great, but I would make small changes to the formatting of libt

[sr #111195] Include libtool-next-version in the libtool distribution

Follow-up Comment #3, sr #95 (group libtool): Here's a proposed patch that adds the libtool-next-version program to the libtool package, including documentation. (file #56957) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: 0001-New-progra

[sr #111196] Linking a static convenience library with fat objects fails if output already exists

Update of sr #96 (group libtool): Status:None => Done Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at: _