Is this log file sufficient ?
Vincent Torri
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Bob Friesenhahn <
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2015, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>>
>> also it seems that on Linux, it's not the case (no such long list of
>> arguments), while on Windows, it is. So
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015, Vincent Torri wrote:
also it seems that on Linux, it's not the case (no such long list of
arguments), while on Windows, it is. So maybe a problem in the Windows
port of libtool
The only way to know this is if we could see the arguments which were
passed to libtool, but yo
Hello,
On 2015-03-25 14:20 +, Andy Falanga (afalanga) wrote:
> I receive much of the mail from libtool in the form of "bounces".
> Ordinarily, I wouldn't worry but this caused the daemon/management
> process for autom...@gnu.org get irritated. I'm wondering, however,
> why I'm having this typ
[Adding Automake]
On 2015-03-23 16:00 +, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> > On Mar 23, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Christian Rössel wrote:
[...]
> > > I discovered some files in
> > > http://ftpmirror.gnu.org/libtool/libtool-2.4.6.tar.gz that IMO
> > > don
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> Here is below the list of arguments
>
> Vincent Torri
>
> libtool: compile: x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
> -I. -I.. -I../src/lib/efl -DPACKAGE_BIN_DIR=\"/opt/windows_64/bin\"
> -DPACKAGE_LIB_DIR=\"/opt/windows_64/lib\"
>
HI,
I receive much of the mail from libtool in the form of "bounces". Ordinarily,
I wouldn't worry but this caused the daemon/management process for
autom...@gnu.org get irritated. I'm wondering, however, why I'm having this
type of trouble. The e-mail address I provided is very much legit.
Here is below the list of arguments
Vincent Torri
libtool: compile: x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I. -I.. -I../src/lib/efl -DPACKAGE_BIN_DIR=\"/opt/windows_64/bin\"
-DPACKAGE_LIB_DIR=\"/opt/windows_64/lib\"
-DPACKAGE_DATA_DIR=\"/opt/windows_64/share/ethumb\"
-DPACKAGE_BUILD_
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015, Vincent Torri wrote:
hello,
In a project i'm following, i've seen that bug report:
https://phab.enlightenment.org/T2225
The build system pass a huge number of identical options and libtool does not
try to remove them
is it a problem with libtool (that is, libtool should
hello,
In a project i'm following, i've seen that bug report:
https://phab.enlightenment.org/T2225
The build system pass a huge number of identical options and libtool does
not try to remove them
is it a problem with libtool (that is, libtool should indeed remove such
identical options) or in t
