On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 18:28 +, Mike Gran wrote:
> I don't know if y'all saw this blogpost where a guy pushed
> the sed regular expression handling into bash-specific
> regular expressions when bash was available. He claims
> there's a significant performance improvement because of
> reduced fo
On 09 Mar 2015 14:48, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 03/09/2015 01:50 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Mar 2015, Mike Gran wrote:
> >> I don't know if y'all saw this blogpost where a guy pushed
> >> the sed regular expression handling into bash-specific
> >> regular expressions when bash was availa
On 03/09/2015 01:50 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2015, Mike Gran wrote:
>
>> Hello libtool,
>>
>> I don't know if y'all saw this blogpost where a guy pushed
>> the sed regular expression handling into bash-specific
>> regular expressions when bash was available. He claims
>> there's
On Mon, 9 Mar 2015, Mike Gran wrote:
Hello libtool,
I don't know if y'all saw this blogpost where a guy pushed
the sed regular expression handling into bash-specific
regular expressions when bash was available. He claims
there's a significant performance improvement because of
reduced forking.
Hello libtool,
I don't know if y'all saw this blogpost where a guy pushed
the sed regular expression handling into bash-specific
regular expressions when bash was available. He claims
there's a significant performance improvement because of
reduced forking.
http://harald.hoyer.xyz/2015/03/05/lib
