On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 23:26, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> Does anyone want to try again?
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2010-11/msg00027.html
>
> I only have red hat like distros, so if someone could update the patch and
> look at other distros that'd be great.
I can have a pl
On 11/29/2011 11:48 PM, Adam Mercer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 23:30, Andy Spencer wrote:
This seems to be caused by libtool adding a -rpath flag which forces the
application to use the /usr/lib64 version provided by mesa even though
ld.so.conf has been properly configured to use the nvidi
On 12/05/2011 11:48 AM, Shamis, Pavel wrote:
Hi,
As have been mentioned on the list, libtool error reporting - "file not found" is not
perfect. People suggested to fix it (http://www.mail-archive.com/libtool@gnu.org/msg12156.html) but
it seems, that the changes have never been incorporated int
On 12/07/2011 11:45 AM, Mark R Bannister wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if someone could point out my error. I've defined a function,
nothing special, takes a couple of args and returns a pointer to a
structure.
The function is not declared with any special keywords. It is not static.
Yet, when compiled
Hi,
I wonder if someone could point out my error. I've defined a function, nothing
special, takes a couple of args and returns a pointer to a structure.
The function is not declared with any special keywords. It is not static.
Yet, when compiled with gcc on Solaris and a .so target is built w
