On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, LRN wrote:
On 18.03.2011 23:51, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, LRN wrote:
Since gcc 4.6.0 it is no longer possible to use LDFLAGS=-no-undefined
gcc now says something like this:
gcc.exe: error: unrecognized option '-no-undefined'
Before 4.6.0 it was possibl
On 18.03.2011 23:51, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, LRN wrote:
Since gcc 4.6.0 it is no longer possible to use LDFLAGS=-no-undefined
gcc now says something like this:
gcc.exe: error: unrecognized option '-no-undefined'
Before 4.6.0 it was possible to do that, and gcc said only this
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, LRN wrote:
Since gcc 4.6.0 it is no longer possible to use LDFLAGS=-no-undefined
gcc now says something like this:
gcc.exe: error: unrecognized option '-no-undefined'
Before 4.6.0 it was possible to do that, and gcc said only this:
gcc.exe: unrecognized option '-no-undefin
Since gcc 4.6.0 it is no longer possible to use LDFLAGS=-no-undefined
gcc now says something like this:
gcc.exe: error: unrecognized option '-no-undefined'
Before 4.6.0 it was possible to do that, and gcc said only this:
gcc.exe: unrecognized option '-no-undefined'
That is, unrecognized option was
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Ralf Wildenhues
wrote:
> * Dan Nicholson wrote on Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:47:38PM CET:
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>
>> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644896#c2
>>
>> This seems more legitimate. I looked at the Makefile.a
Pacho,
hope you're reading the list. Mail from me to you bounces because some
MTA near your end is over-eagerly using SPF to reject legitimate mail.
Rakf
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 08:43:21PM CET:
> Hello Pacho,
>
> * Pacho Ramos wrote on Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:48:51AM CE
Hello Pacho,
* Pacho Ramos wrote on Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:48:51AM CET:
> We have some downstream opened bugs with similar cases, would you mind
> asking for help with them here in the future once their respective
> upstream refuse to fix the issues?
Feel free to come to this mailing list for he
El jue, 17-03-2011 a las 15:47 -0700, Dan Nicholson escribió:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > Downstream on Gentoo we see some package having problems at "make
> > install" phase using -j2 or more. Reporting to upstream, some of them
> > told us that they th
