Re: bogus warning 'seems to be moved'

2010-09-23 Thread Marco Atzeri
--- Ven 24/9/10, Charles Wilson ha scritto: > On 9/24/2010 12:45 AM, Marco Atzeri > wrote: > > I am not sure to follow your explanation. > > > > on cygwin > > > > $cd /usr/lib > > I'm cross building, using $build_os=cygwin, but > $host_os=mingw32, and a > cross compiler.  I am *not* building n

Re: bogus warning 'seems to be moved'

2010-09-23 Thread Marco Atzeri
--- Ven 24/9/10, Ralf Wildenhues ha scritto: > Hello Marco, > > thanks for the bug report. > > * Marco Atzeri wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:49:56AM > CEST: > > is this bogus warning avoidable in the next release ? > >  > > libtool: link: warning: > `/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.4/../../..

Re: bogus warning 'seems to be moved'

2010-09-23 Thread Marco Atzeri
--- Ven 24/9/10, Marco Atzeri ha scritto: > --- Ven 24/9/10, Charles Wilson  > ha scritto: > > > Just FYI... > > > > I don't think the following scenario applies to either > of > > you, but I ran > > into the warning in the case described below -- and > the > > warning is valid > > (e.g. we sh

Re: bogus warning 'seems to be moved'

2010-09-23 Thread Charles Wilson
On 9/24/2010 12:45 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: > I am not sure to follow your explanation. > > on cygwin > > $cd /usr/lib I'm cross building, using $build_os=cygwin, but $host_os=mingw32, and a cross compiler. I am *not* building natively. In this situation, and with the new "sysroot" support in l

Re: bogus warning 'seems to be moved'

2010-09-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Marco, thanks for the bug report. * Marco Atzeri wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:49:56AM CEST: > is this bogus warning avoidable in the next release ? > > libtool: link: warning: > `/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.4/../../../libfontconfig.la' seems to be > moved > libtool: link: warnin

Re: bogus warning 'seems to be moved'

2010-09-23 Thread Marco Atzeri
--- Ven 24/9/10, Charles Wilson ha scritto: > Just FYI... > > I don't think the following scenario applies to either of > you, but I ran > into the warning in the case described below -- and the > warning is valid > (e.g. we shouldn't try to fix MY case). > > I was using a cross compiler with s

Re: autobuild results

2010-09-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Good morning Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:40:48PM CEST: > Den 2010-09-23 20:05 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: > >> I have plans to soon mail output from the v2.4 tag with OPTIONS as > >> below on MSYS: > > *snip* > > > > That looks all fine to me. Thanks! > Ok, done, and they a

Re: bogus warning 'seems to be moved'

2010-09-23 Thread Charles Wilson
Just FYI... I don't think the following scenario applies to either of you, but I ran into the warning in the case described below -- and the warning is valid (e.g. we shouldn't try to fix MY case). I was using a cross compiler with sysroot support (cygwin->mingw) to build cygwin's setup.exe. I w

Re: bogus warning 'seems to be moved'

2010-09-23 Thread Marco Atzeri
--- Gio 23/9/10, Dave Korn ha scritto: > On 22/09/2010 09:49, Marco Atzeri > wrote: > > > Dear developers, > > is this bogus warning avoidable in the next release ? > >  > > libtool: link: warning: > > > `/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.4/../../../libfontconfig.la' > > seems to be moved > > libt

Re: autobuild results

2010-09-23 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-09-23 20:05 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: >> I have plans to soon mail output from the v2.4 tag with OPTIONS as >> below on MSYS: > *snip* > > That looks all fine to me. Thanks! Hi Ralf, Ok, done, and they appeared just fine on the site too. Since you said you were going to collect them, woul

Re: Multi lib 32 bits support

2010-09-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello t7, please consider using the bug-libtool list for bug reports and a real name for posting, that is considered friendly. Thanks. * t66...@gmail.com wrote on Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:11:34AM CEST: > The new released libtool 2.4 fixed my compilation problem while > linking a dll with code

Re: Autoconf tests, libtool symlist files, undefined behavior, and LTO

2010-09-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello t7, * t66...@gmail.com wrote on Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 03:01:31AM CEST: > I don't know if my problem suites this description. No, it doesn't. > Currently installed libtool on this system is, > ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 2.2.6b > > I recently tested the LTO feature of GCC (targeting windows

autobuild results (was: 2.4 Release in 24hrs)

2010-09-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 08:54:43AM CEST: > Den 2010-09-20 19:41 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: > > I'd really appreciate if you guys could send build logs to the autobuild > > server as I've been doing lately, much more than just posting > > non-verbose results on the list he

Re: bogus warning 'seems to be moved'

2010-09-23 Thread Dave Korn
On 22/09/2010 09:49, Marco Atzeri wrote: > Dear developers, > is this bogus warning avoidable in the next release ? > > libtool: link: warning: > `/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.4/../../../libfontconfig.la' > seems to be moved > libtool: link: warning: > `/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.4/../..

Multi lib 32 bits support

2010-09-23 Thread t66...@gmail.com
Hello: The new released libtool 2.4 fixed my compilation problem while linking a dll with code compiled with -flto. Now I have new problem with 32-bit. I think libtool 2.4 breaks multi-lib 32-bit. For 64-bit it was ok. Also I didn't notice this error while using older libtool came with the o/s