On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Vincent Torri wrote on Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 06:46:31AM CEST:
I checked out libtool git 2 days ago and try to compile a library
that uses libole32 or libws2_32 with mingw-w64 (cross compilation on
linux). I get the usual message:
*** Warning: link
* Vincent Torri wrote on Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 06:46:31AM CEST:
> I checked out libtool git 2 days ago and try to compile a library
> that uses libole32 or libws2_32 with mingw-w64 (cross compilation on
> linux). I get the usual message:
>
> *** Warning: linker path does not have real file for libr
* David wrote on Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 04:31:08AM CEST:
> Instead of relying in only one person and possibly waiting for his response,
> how about to start supporting it in all other arches and disabling it on
> untested arches like WinCE?
That's not the point. The question was for some reorgani
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, David wrote:
On Martes 24 Agosto 2010 21:32:13 Ralf Wildenhues escribió:
* Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:23:26PM CEST:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:25:12PM CEST:
I Cc:ed you on the thread,
Hey,
I checked out libtool git 2 days ago and try to compile a library that
uses libole32 or libws2_32 with mingw-w64 (cross compilation on linux). I
get the usual message:
*** Warning: linker path does not have real file for library -lole32.
etc...
No problem with mingw. A guy from mingw-w
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:23:26PM CEST:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:25:12PM CEST:
I Cc:ed you on the thread, was that wrong? How can we reach you?
Please an
On Martes 24 Agosto 2010 21:32:13 Ralf Wildenhues escribió:
> * Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:23:26PM CEST:
> > On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > >* Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:25:12PM CEST:
> > >>>I Cc:ed you on the thread, was that wrong? How can
Based on the debug output I changed the names of the Boost dll's from
boost_xxx.dll to libboost_xxx.dll and the warning went away.
I was under the impression that the search order for libraries was:
libxxx.dll.a
xxx.dll.a
libxxx.a
libxxx.dll
xxx.dll
Apparently it is not so.
This trick did NOT wo
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 18:53 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> If 2.2.10 is still not working right, please post the output of
> the failing 'libtool --mode=link' command, with --debug added as
> first argument after libtool. Thank you.
I am sorry to say but it fails. Attached the output from the co
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 18:53 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Which ./libtool --version is your package using? With 2.2.10,
> no hacks should be necessary.
>
> If 2.2.10 is still not working right, please post the output of
> the failing 'libtool --mode=link' command, with --debug added as
> first
* Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:23:26PM CEST:
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >* Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:25:12PM CEST:
> >>>I Cc:ed you on the thread, was that wrong? How can we reach you?
> >
> >Please answer this. Without somebody to ask a
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Vincent, what about the other question I asked:
* Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:25:12PM CEST:
I Cc:ed you on the thread, was that wrong? How can we reach you?
Please answer this. Without somebody to ask about WinCE we *can* *no
Vincent, what about the other question I asked:
* Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:25:12PM CEST:
> >I Cc:ed you on the thread, was that wrong? How can we reach you?
Please answer this. Without somebody to ask about WinCE we *can* *not*
support it.
> >http://thread.gmane.org/gmane
That's unfortunate, because it cost us a couple of months now. :-/
I Cc:ed you on the thread, was that wrong? How can we reach you?
What is the problem with WinCE ?
See here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general/10794/focus=9990
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libt
Hello Vincent,
* Vincent Torri wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:09:18PM CEST:
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> >* David wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 06:32:22PM CEST:
> >>I've been searching mailing list for supporting -flto in libtool, and seen
> >>several (commited?) patches.
>
Hey
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* David wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 06:32:22PM CEST:
I've been searching mailing list for supporting -flto in libtool, and seen
several (commited?) patches.
not yet committed, unfortunately; I had hoped for feedback from a person
knowledgeab
Hello David,
* David wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 06:32:22PM CEST:
> I've been searching mailing list for supporting -flto in libtool, and seen
> several (commited?) patches.
not yet committed, unfortunately; I had hoped for feedback from a person
knowledgeable with WinCE, but that didn't happe
Hello,
* Eric Blake wrote on Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 06:47:51PM CEST:
> On 08/24/2010 10:42 AM, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> >*** Since this library must not contain undefined symbols,
> >*** because either the platform does not support them or
> >*** it was explicitly requested with -no-undefined,
> >
[adding libtool]
On 08/24/2010 10:42 AM, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
*** Since this library must not contain undefined symbols,
*** because either the platform does not support them or
*** it was explicitly requested with -no-undefined,
*** libtool will only create a static version of it.
It seems
I've been searching mailing list for supporting -flto in libtool, and seen
several (commited?) patches.
The problem is that I've tried git version of libtool (trunk) and still it is
not supported since any program will compile with -flto (for example,
mysql-5.1.50).
Then, I have several questi
20 matches
Mail list logo
