Re: Building modules on AIX

2010-08-20 Thread Daniel Sands
Trying again since I left the mailing list out of the reply... On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 20:13 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Daniel Sands wrote on Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 08:11:01PM CEST: > > Yeah I'm just trying to avoid the RTL because it sometimes gums up the > > works. APR started with -brtl and

Re: Building modules on AIX

2010-08-20 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Daniel, please don't top-post, thank you! * Daniel Sands wrote on Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 08:11:01PM CEST: > Yeah I'm just trying to avoid the RTL because it sometimes gums up the > works. APR started with -brtl and it caused a bunch of headaches trying > to make that work--it built both the

Re: Building modules on AIX

2010-08-20 Thread Daniel Sands
Yeah I'm just trying to avoid the RTL because it sometimes gums up the works. APR started with -brtl and it caused a bunch of headaches trying to make that work--it built both the .so's and the static libraries, and APR-UTIL linked to the static libraries instead of the .so's. Maybe the .la gener

Re: Building modules on AIX

2010-08-20 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Daniel, * Daniel Sands wrote on Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:16:04PM CEST: > I'm using 2.2.10. > > Didn't Libtool once have the behavior on AIX that if -module was > specified, it wouldn't wrap the .so in a .a archive? I'm on the run right now, so can't really confirm that this wasn't ever the cas

Building modules on AIX

2010-08-20 Thread Daniel Sands
I'm using 2.2.10. Didn't Libtool once have the behavior on AIX that if -module was specified, it wouldn't wrap the .so in a .a archive? I'm having trouble building and installing Apache because it is wrapping its mod_'s. Is there a configuration flag to change this? ___