Re: Building shared libraries at configuration time

2010-06-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Bob, * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 04:48:48PM CEST: [ __thread ] > > You will likely find that 'valgrind' is not particularly friendly or > helpful to diagnose memory problems in applications using this > extension. Is that still the case with valgrind 3.5? Its testsuite co

Re: Building shared libraries at configuration time

2010-06-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Bob, Bob Friesenhahn writes: > On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >>> On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >>> Hello, GNU Guile relies on TLS (thread-local storage) support where available, and can live without it on inferior systems. However, I haven’t foun

Re: Building shared libraries at configuration time

2010-06-01 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Ludovic Courtès wrote: On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Ludovic Courtès wrote: Hello, GNU Guile relies on TLS (thread-local storage) support where available, and can live without it on inferior systems. However, I haven’t found a reliable way to check whether TLS is supported. Why ar

Re: Building shared libraries at configuration time

2010-06-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Ralf, Ralf Wildenhues writes: > * Ludovic Courtès wrote on Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:15:32AM CEST: >> So it seems that the right test, when compiling natively, involves >> building a shared library and an executable linked against it, and >> running that executable. That’s where you come in.

Re: Building shared libraries at configuration time

2010-06-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Bob, Bob Friesenhahn writes: > On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> GNU Guile relies on TLS (thread-local storage) support where available, >> and can live without it on inferior systems. However, I haven’t found a >> reliable way to check whether TLS is supported. >