Re: revisiting condor and libtool

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 00:26, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Yes, the condor_compile script puts the quotes all in the wrong places. > To work around it, use AC_CONFIG_HEADERS([config.h]) and include that > from your code.  Your build setup looks ok otherwise. Thought so. > Below's a completely untes

Re: revisiting condor and libtool

Hi Adam, * Adam Mercer wrote on Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 04:48:57AM CET: > Making all in src > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/ram/condor_libtool-0.1/src' > condor_compile gcc -std=gnu99 -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"condor_libtool\" > -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"condor_libtool\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"0.1\" > -DPACKAGE_S

revisiting condor and libtool

Hi A while ago I posted a question regarding problems I was having with updating a project, that is built for the condor workflow management system (http://www.cs.wisc.edu/condor/), to the latest version of libtool: unfortunately

Re: LT_SCOPE obsolete?

On Mon, 30 Nov 2009, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: Is it safe to remove all the ugly LT_SCOPE glue from libltdl yet (without breaking correct compilation on any of the Windows based systems we to support)? Without this ugly LT_SCOPE glue it is not possible to support the Microsoft C compiler as wel

LT_SCOPE obsolete?

Is it safe to remove all the ugly LT_SCOPE glue from libltdl yet (without breaking correct compilation on any of the Windows based systems we to support)? Cheers, Gary -- Gary V. Vaughan (g...@gnu.org) ___ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lib