Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 10/11/2009 11:41 AM, Kent Boortz wrote:
>> (F) The linker, it should know about GLIBC_PRIVATE, and search for
>> non private occurrences first, then if not found do another scan
>> for private ones?
>
> No, GLIBC_PRIVATE is not very different from ABC_XYZ
Ralf Wildenhues writes:
> Not sure yet what would be the best way to avoid this issue, but can you
> work around it with either of the following?
>
> - remove -lc -lgcc from /usr/lib/libunwind.la
>
> - the patch below. This patch is probably a bit too general, but as I
> said I don't know a be
On 10/11/2009 11:41 AM, Kent Boortz wrote:
(F) The linker, it should know about GLIBC_PRIVATE, and search for
non private occurrences first, then if not found do another scan
for private ones?
No, GLIBC_PRIVATE is not very different from ABC_XYZ from the linker's
point-of-view. :
