On Thursday 08 October 2009 12:11:41 Ali Abdallah wrote:
> I'm using libtool 2.2.6a, and i want to avoid installing the .la files,
> however i spend a lot of time trying to figure out how but i couldn't
> manage, please help.
there is no hook for it. you'd have to add an automake post hook to rm
On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Ali Abdallah wrote:
libfoo_la_LIBTOOLFLAGS = --tag=disable-static
What i'm a building is a loadable module by a specific program, so the .la
file is completely useless.
I suggest that you read the libtool documentation regarding modules.
Then you can decide if the .la fi
Hi,
I'm using libtool 2.2.6a, and i want to avoid installing the .la files,
however i spend a lot of time trying to figure out how but i couldn't
manage, please help.
configure.ac
AC_DISABLE_STATIC()
AC_PROG_LIBTOOL()
Makefile.am
libfoo_la_LIBTOOLFLAGS = --tag=disable-static
What i'm a bu
Thanks for all your clarifying emails :-)
cheers
Lore
--
Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DI, Univ. Torino
ICQ# lbetto, 16080134 (GNU/Linux User # 158233)
HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http://www.purplesucker.com
http://www.myspace.com/supertrouperabba
BLOGS: htt
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello Will,
>
> * Will Newton wrote on Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 06:09:03PM CEST:
>> I am trying to build some mainstream packages on a non-mainstream
>> Linux architecture that prepends an underscore to symbol names (e.g.,
>> "foo" in C is "_foo