Re: removal of .la files from Debian and a possible solution to the libtool shared libs problem

On Tuesday 01 September 2009 12:33:09 Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 04:38:04PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Monday 31 August 2009 15:56:06 Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 08:55:21PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > * Kurt Roeckx wrote on Sun, Aug 30, 2009

Re: removal of .la files from Debian and a possible solution to the libtool shared libs problem

libxcb version 1.0 installed: /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.la /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0 /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0.0.0 However, libxcb version 1.4 did not install the above mentioned files. libX11 version 1.1.3 linked using /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.la. All software linked with libX11

Re: removal of .la files from Debian and a possible solution to the libtool shared libs problem

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 04:38:04PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 31 August 2009 15:56:06 Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 08:55:21PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > * Kurt Roeckx wrote on Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:31:39PM CEST: > > > > I've mailed about this issue before.

dlpreopen and noinst_LTLIBRARIES

Hello, I have written an executable and plugins for it. I want to bind the plugins within the executable, so that I have at the end one single file containing the executables and the plugins. For binding the plugins, I use ..._LDADD += -dlpreopen plugin. Since I have now the libraries&plug