Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
login5.intrepid$ ./config.guess
./config.guess: unable to guess system type
[...]
config.guess timestamp = 2009-02-03
uname -m = 4400
uname -r = 4.0
uname -s = iainfo2
uname -v = 3.0
/bin/arch = ppc64
UNAME_MACHINE = 4400
UNAME_
>>> Vincent Torri 4/18/2009 10:27 PM >>>
Hey,
> * Vincent Torri wrote on Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 09:45:24AM CEST:
>> i have written a library which can be compiled for windows xp or windows
>> ce. The source files are only C files with windows ce, and there is a c++
>> file with windows xp.
>
> I
* Vincent Torri wrote on Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 07:50:21PM CEST:
> According to the value in the Makefile, this:
>
> if EVIL_HAVE_WINCE
>
> libevil_la_LINK = $(LINK) $(libevil_la_CFLAGS) $(libevil_la_LDFLAGS)
>
> else
>
> libevil_la_CXXFLAGS = -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions
> libevil_la_LINK = $(CXXLINK)
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Vincent Torri wrote on Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 07:13:11PM CEST:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Vincent Torri wrote:
Anyway, you can work around it by setting foo_LINK.
ok, so it's just a matter of using the correct link options
another question related
* Vincent Torri wrote on Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 07:13:11PM CEST:
> On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Vincent Torri wrote:
>>> Anyway, you can work around it by setting foo_LINK.
>> ok, so it's just a matter of using the correct link options
>
> another question related to that. I have that following code:
>
> l
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Vincent Torri wrote:
Hey,
Anyway, you
can work around it by setting foo_LINK. Here's an example.
ok, so it's just a matter of using the correct link options
another question related to that. I have that following code:
libevil_la_LDFLAGS = -no-undefined -Wl,--ena
Hey,
* Vincent Torri wrote on Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 09:45:24AM CEST:
i have written a library which can be compiled for windows xp or windows
ce. The source files are only C files with windows ce, and there is a c++
file with windows xp.
I assume that this C++ file is added with an Automake c
Hello Ineiev,
* Ineiev wrote on Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 09:35:13AM CEST:
> My goal was to use in an application two
> versions of the same library simultaneously.
Hmm, I don't think this goal is achievable portably. At least not
without renaming all symbols (i.e., you may need to change the source
Hi John,
* John R. Cary wrote on Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:13:54PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>> OK. That's fairly easy to support in Libtool then: the only thing we
>> need to get right is to turn off shared library support completely for
>> BG/L.
>
> I gave the wrong impression. This is a BG
Hi Vincent,
* Vincent Torri wrote on Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 09:45:24AM CEST:
> i have written a library which can be compiled for windows xp or windows
> ce. The source files are only C files with windows ce, and there is a c++
> file with windows xp.
I assume that this C++ file is added with an
hey
i have written a library which can be compiled for windows xp or windows
ce. The source files are only C files with windows ce, and there is a c++
file with windows xp.
when i compile for windows ce, only gcc i used, but the link uses g++ to
create the DLL. There is also no c++ flags.
11 matches
Mail list logo