Re: Getting filenames for libraries

Hello Jason, * Jason Curl wrote on Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 08:43:35PM CET: > > I can't move over to libtool 2.2.x just yet (most distros I support > still have 1.5.26 - sorry) and I'm generating libraries. FWIW, most distros have a way to use upstream packages without re-libtoolizing and re-autore

Re: just how much autotools got faster, or: just forget about dolt

On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 6:51 AM, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For all dolt junkies, and whoever claims autotools and esp. libtool > are performance hogs: yes, they are still not the fastest thing in > the world. But we are getting better: > > As an example, I built the ompi/ subdir

Getting filenames for libraries

Hello, I can't move over to libtool 2.2.x just yet (most distros I support still have 1.5.26 - sorry) and I'm generating libraries. Is there any way, given an la file, to get the file name of the library that will be generated at make time? libtool --config gives me partial information (suc