Re: libtool versioning and sonames

2007-10-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Andreas Metzler wrote on Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 01:28:54PM CET: > > Are there libtool-supported archs whose versioning will break if we do > this > num c r a > 2.1.1 22 1 9 > 2.1.2 14 0 0 > > instead of > num c r a > 2.1.1 22 1 9 > 2.1.

Re: libtool versioning and sonames

2007-10-28 Thread Andreas Metzler
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Andreas Metzler wrote on Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:34:25AM CET: >> [...] However, the way libtool >> tries to represent this information in sonames (on Linux) is rather >> strange, it goes straight from libgnutls.so.13 to libgnutls.so.23. Is >> this huge

Re: libtool versioning and sonames

2007-10-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Andreas, * Andreas Metzler wrote on Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:34:25AM CET: > > [...] However, the way libtool > tries to represent this information in sonames (on Linux) is rather > strange, it goes straight from libgnutls.so.13 to libgnutls.so.23. Is > this huge jump just bug or is there a r

libtool versioning and sonames

2007-10-28 Thread Andreas Metzler
Hello, gnutls recently had an incompatible API change (interfaces removed) and therefore made this change: num c r a 2.1.1 22 1 9 2.1.2 23 0 0 which is supposed to mean (according to the libtool manual), that 2.1.1 supported interfaces 13-22 and 2.1.2 s