RE: Relinking issue

2007-10-09 Thread Duft Markus
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello Markus, > > * Duft Markus wrote on Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 09:25:15AM CEST: >> >> Regarding CVS HEAD: since this is all for production use on many, >> many platforms, i can't upgrade (it's simply not my decision). Is >> HEAD somewhat stable a

Re: Libtool is "unfatting" my universal binaries

2007-10-09 Thread peter
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 03:44:25PM -0600, Brian wrote: > It kind of fixed it. Everything is universal, but nothing works because my > libs/bins are linked against .out files in /var/tmp ! These files are not > even present in that location when I look... > When linking a shared library without a

Re: Libtool is "unfatting" my universal binaries

2007-10-09 Thread Brian
It kind of fixed it. Everything is universal, but nothing works because my libs/bins are linked against .out files in /var/tmp ! These files are not even present in that location when I look... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/Users/mingus/emergent/src/temt/lib/.libs -> !otool otool -L libtemt-4.0.7.1.0.0.dylib

Re: Relinking issue

2007-10-09 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Markus, * Duft Markus wrote on Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 09:25:15AM CEST: > > Regarding CVS HEAD: since this is all for production use on many, many > platforms, i can't upgrade (it's simply not my decision). Is HEAD > somewhat stable anyway? I noticed that binutils 2.18 use 2.1a, and - arg > -

Re: libtool & mac os x: framework problem

2007-10-09 Thread Vadim Godunko
Peter O'Gorman wrote: Yes, I thought it would be libQt, Trolltech generate their own .la files without using libtool, these have -framework Carbon etc in dependency_libs. Since libtool did not generate these files, I do not really consider it a libtool bug that libtool cannot read them, tha

Re: Libtool is "unfatting" my universal binaries

2007-10-09 Thread Brian
Peter, `autoreconf -fi' fixed it. Thank you! On 10/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 06:38:11PM -0600, Brian wrote: > > Peter, thanks for your comments. I build libtool from source, and am > using > > 1.5.24. I manually ran the large link command, inser

Re: Libtool is "unfatting" my universal binaries

2007-10-09 Thread peter
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 06:38:11PM -0600, Brian wrote: > Peter, thanks for your comments. I build libtool from source, and am using > 1.5.24. I manually ran the large link command, inserting `-arch i386 -arch > ppc' after g++, and it did create a universal library: > http://pastey.net/75062 > > B

Re: libtool & mac os x: framework problem

2007-10-09 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Oct 9, 2007, at 5:52 AM, Vadim Godunko wrote: Peter O'Gorman wrote: What is the status of libtool support for Mac OS X? What version? A glibtool that ships with Mac OS X, or one that comes from gnu.org? $ libtool --version ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.24 (1.1220.2.455 2007/06/24 02:13:29

RE: Relinking issue

2007-10-09 Thread Duft Markus
Hi Ralf! >> Somehow executables are still relinked, and i just can't find the >> place where this happens. Something in the back of my mind tells me >> that it has something to do with the lt-${name} executables, could >> this be correct? > > It's the other way round: because relinking is done, t