On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Philip Kovacs wrote:
I'm using libtool 1.5.24 with libltdl as a convenience library in subdir
./libltdl.
I followed the instructions here:
http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual.html#Distributing-libltdl
The problem is that make targets 'dist' and 'distcheck' yield t
I'm using libtool 1.5.24 with libltdl as a convenience library in subdir
./libltdl.
I followed the instructions here:
http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual.html#Distributing-libltdl
The problem is that make targets 'dist' and 'distcheck' yield the error:
make: *** No rule to make target
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 13:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]$ ldd fool
> > linux-gate.so.1 => (0x009be000)
> > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00b82000)
> > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00b65000)
>
> i'm not sure how this sample output explains the comment that
On Wednesday 22 August 2007, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 06:40 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 August 2007, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> > > libsuff=`ldd conftest 2>/dev/null | awk '/libc\.so/
> > > {n=split([$]3,x,"/"); for (i=0; i < n; i++) { if (x[[i]] == "lib64")
>
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 06:40 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 August 2007, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> > libsuff=`ldd conftest 2>/dev/null | awk '/libc\.so/
> > {n=split([$]3,x,"/"); for (i=0; i < n; i++) { if (x[[i]] == "lib64") {print
> > "64"}}}'`
>
> this test would still be subject t
On Wednesday 22 August 2007, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> libsuff=`ldd conftest 2>/dev/null | awk '/libc\.so/
> {n=split([$]3,x,"/"); for (i=0; i < n; i++) { if (x[[i]] == "lib64") {print
> "64"}}}'`
this test would still be subject to the environment of ldd ... in otherwords,
it is still possible to
Omri Azencot wrote:
On 8/21/07, Jason Curl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you don't need to have the libraries installed for a convenience
library, use "noinst_*". See:
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/automake.html#A-Library
Similarly for libtool:
http://www.gnu.org/software/libto
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 09:30 -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> Hi,
> Albert pointed out to me yesterday that while, with 1.5.24 we now add
> the correct directories to sys_lib_search_path_spec, they do not get
> added to sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec, resulting in libtool putting, for
> example, /usr/lib6
