On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 23:05 -0400, David Fang wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm having a problem testing some libtool (ltdl) modules, but only
> on OS X (darwin7 and darwin8, libtool 1.5.22 and .24). My executable
> lt_dlopens a .la library in another built directory (during make check
> testing), and fail
Hi,
I'm having a problem testing some libtool (ltdl) modules, but only
on OS X (darwin7 and darwin8, libtool 1.5.22 and .24). My executable
lt_dlopens a .la library in another built directory (during make check
testing), and fails with an lt_dlerror message like:
dlopen(../../lib/mymodule
Jason Curl wrote:
> /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -version-info
> 0:0:0 -o libtp.la -rpath /usr/local/lib version.lo
> libtool: link: warning: undefined symbols not allowed in i686-pc-cygwin
> shared libraries
Libtool won't build shared libraries on Win32/PE targets witho
Hello,
I'm having some real problems with libtool getting it to link shared
libraries. I've created a very basic system that exhibits the same
problems I'm seeing. At the end is a brief overview of the configure.ac
and the Makefile.am's.
*** Cygwin: Detects shared/static but won't build.
$ ./c
Hello Eric,
* Eric Blake wrote on Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 05:33:31AM CEST:
>
> We ought to be consistent across all of the autotools. I personally
> prefer ARFLAGS over AR_FLAGS, since it is CFLAGS and not C_FLAGS.
Yes, if the variable in question fulfills the same semantics.
Here, it definitely d
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Then this condition needs to be testable. I see two options:
- Automatically disable shared libraries on this platform
- Link statically from this library to our shared library
There are more options; see below. FWIW, I typically use notation
that's the other way ro
Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 13:29 +0200, Jason Curl wrote:
As for testing the situation, AC_CHECK_LIB makes me believe it will
work. But it only works in a subset of cases (i.e. static only). I have
another implementation that I can compile in but at the moment there is
no i
* Jason Curl wrote on Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 01:29:36PM CEST:
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps the authors of libiberty do not expect that it will be used by
>> anyone else.
I don't think so.
> Then this condition needs to be testable. I see two options:
> - Automatically disable shared libr
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 13:29 +0200, Jason Curl wrote:
>
> As for testing the situation, AC_CHECK_LIB makes me believe it will
> work. But it only works in a subset of cases (i.e. static only). I have
> another implementation that I can compile in but at the moment there is
> no indication I shou
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Jason Curl wrote:
I have a system that supports shared libraries (Solaris 9). As part
of some checks for 'getopt_long' I check if it exists in 'libiberty'
if I can't find it in the standard system. It's there in libiberty.
Now the problem occurs be
10 matches
Mail list logo