Re: Mac OS X isysroot and lib dependencies

2007-07-10 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 18:23 +0300, Heikki Lindholm wrote: > Peter O'Gorman kirjoitti: > > On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 11:16 +0300, Heikki Lindholm wrote: > > > >>Hello, > >> > >>I'm trying to build a libtoolized project in a Mac OS X SDK using the > >>appropriate -isysroot/-syslibroot flags, but libtoo

Re: Mac OS X isysroot and lib dependencies

2007-07-10 Thread Heikki Lindholm
Peter O'Gorman kirjoitti: On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 11:16 +0300, Heikki Lindholm wrote: Hello, I'm trying to build a libtoolized project in a Mac OS X SDK using the appropriate -isysroot/-syslibroot flags, but libtool seems to fail when there's a library installed in the SDK, say /home/MySDK/usr

Re: Mac OS X isysroot and lib dependencies

2007-07-10 Thread Heikki Lindholm
Peter O'Gorman kirjoitti: On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 11:16 +0300, Heikki Lindholm wrote: Hello, I'm trying to build a libtoolized project in a Mac OS X SDK using the appropriate -isysroot/-syslibroot flags, but libtool seems to fail when there's a library installed in the SDK, say /home/MySDK/usr

Re: Mac OS X isysroot and lib dependencies

2007-07-10 Thread Peter O'Gorman
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 11:16 +0300, Heikki Lindholm wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to build a libtoolized project in a Mac OS X SDK using the > appropriate -isysroot/-syslibroot flags, but libtool seems to fail when > there's a library installed in the SDK, say /home/MySDK/usr/local/lib, > with

Re: normal ltdl linking suggestions?

2007-07-10 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Benoit SIGOURE wrote: Your approach is outright heresy. With this approach, users would simply install a copy of GNU 'autobuild' prior to building all other packages. This would result in no need for embedded autoconf, automake, and libtool in all the packages. Shame on

Mac OS X isysroot and lib dependencies

2007-07-10 Thread Heikki Lindholm
Hello, I'm trying to build a libtoolized project in a Mac OS X SDK using the appropriate -isysroot/-syslibroot flags, but libtool seems to fail when there's a library installed in the SDK, say /home/MySDK/usr/local/lib, with dependencies in the .la file, such as dependency_libs='/usr/local/li

Re: Library order in gcc command

2007-07-10 Thread Arvid Brodin
On 2007-07-09 19:40, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 14:44 +0200, Arvid Brodin wrote: >> I am doing a test installation of GTK+ on top of DirectFB (instead of on >> X11). (I'm later going to cross compile this for an embedded system.) Now, >> GTK+ depends on Cairo, and Cairo in turn

Re: normal ltdl linking suggestions?

2007-07-10 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Monday 09 July 2007 22:54:34 Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > Your approach is outright heresy. With this approach, users would > simply install a copy of GNU 'autobuild' prior to building all other > packages. This would result in no need for embedded autoconf, > automake, and libtool in all the pack

Re: normal ltdl linking suggestions?

2007-07-10 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Monday 09 July 2007 23:40:35 Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > I don't think Libtool needs to provide a pkg-config file, but providing > a macro to use an external libltdl, and having the macro set LTDLINCL > and LIBLTDL (or other variables) correctly for use should work just > fine. debugging configure

Re: normal ltdl linking suggestions?

2007-07-10 Thread Benoit SIGOURE
On Jul 9, 2007, at 10:54 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: Hi Gary, On Monday 09 July 2007 17:47:13 Gary V. Vaughan wrote: All the world is not Linux. By not shipping libltdl at all, you're making life difficult for the users of hundreds of other pl