* Christopher Hulbert wrote on Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 09:22:31PM CEST:
> On 4/3/07, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for your patch. But really when porting to a w64 system
> > (including a specific compiler and toolset), I'd prefer a reasonably
> > complete port, at least incl
Hello Benoit,
* Benoit Sigoure wrote on Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 12:42:52AM CEST:
> [...]
> checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran 77 compiler... no
> checking whether accepts -g... no
> checking how to get verbose linking output from ... configure: WARNING:
> compilation failed
> checking for
On Apr 3, 2007, at 5:51 PM, Simon Josefsson wrote:
On 4 apr 2007, at 00.21, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On Apr 3, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Simon Josefsson wrote:
On 3 apr 2007, at 23.44, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Do I understand correctly that Darwin has no way to hardcode
library
paths (other than t
On 4 apr 2007, at 00.21, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On Apr 3, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Simon Josefsson wrote:
On 3 apr 2007, at 23.44, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Do I understand correctly that Darwin has no way to hardcode library
paths (other than the ones given by -install-name)? OK to apply and
backp
Hello
I have just made a fresh checkout of CVS head and I failed to bootstrap it:
$ cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/sources/libtool co .
[...]
$ cd libtool && ./bootstrap && ./configure && make distcheck
[...]
WARNING: You might want to regenerate `commit' and `libltdl/config/mailnotify'
WA
Quoting Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello Benoit,
* Benoit Sigoure wrote on Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 04:19:25PM CEST:
[Compilation of the libkernel]
This link line:
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link arm-linux-g++ [losts of -Warning
flags] -pthread -g -O2 -pipe -static -o li
On 4/3/07, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Christopher,
* Christopher Hulbert wrote on Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 08:36:02PM CEST:
> The attached patch allows compilers without unistd.h to generate
> executables on windows 32 and 64-bit. This may not be the desired
> version since it
Hi Simon,
* Simon Josefsson wrote on Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 11:17:20AM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > I think you should be able to work around it by adding
> > -R ../src
> >
> > to the link flags for `simple' (untested, please try it! self: also put
> > in testsuite)
Hello Christopher,
* Christopher Hulbert wrote on Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 08:36:02PM CEST:
> The attached patch allows compilers without unistd.h to generate
> executables on windows 32 and 64-bit. This may not be the desired
> version since it will be active on at least the MINGW host. On the
> othe
Hello Benoit,
* Benoit Sigoure wrote on Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 04:19:25PM CEST:
>
> [Compilation of the libkernel]
This link line:
> /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link arm-linux-g++ [losts of -Warning
> flags] -pthread -g -O2 -pipe -static -o libkernel.la -rpath
> /home/build/built/kerne
The attached patch allows compilers without unistd.h to generate
executables on windows 32 and 64-bit. This may not be the desired
version since it will be active on at least the MINGW host. On the
other hand, MINGW will support the code so it may not be a big deal.
Note: The relevant hunks of th
Hello list,
I'm posting this message here but I'm not sure whether this is really related to
libtool or to the way GCC was compiled. I am using a cross compiler for
arm-linux distributed by ELDK (Embedded Linux Development Kit --
http://www.denx.de/wiki/DULG/ELDK). With this compiler, I first co
12 matches
Mail list logo
