Olly Betts <> wrote:
> On 2006-11-28, Duft Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you could tell me how i can bring outlook to do so, i will gladly
>> ;o)
>
> Off-topic, but in the interests of improving the readability of this
> list (and others!):
>
> Outlook:
>
> http://home.in.tum.de/~jain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:39:24 +0200, "Ralf Wildenhues" said:
AFAICS, this can only happen if libltdl was treated with automake-1.9
and the tests run with automake-1.10 in place, so that the toplevel
package (named subproject-demo-2.1a) is treated with 1.10.
I'm not so
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:39:24 +0200, "Ralf Wildenhues" said:
> Hi Charles,
>
> Thanks for the bug report.
>
> * Charles Wilson wrote on Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 07:32:12AM CET:
> >
> > ../../libtool-HEAD/tests/subproject.at:56: $MAKE all $tst_dist
> > + make all dist
> [...]
> > mkdir: cannot create
On 2006-11-28, Duft Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you could tell me how i can bring outlook to do so, i will gladly ;o)
Off-topic, but in the interests of improving the readability of this
list (and others!):
Outlook:
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/
Outlook Expre
Hi Charles,
Thanks for the bug report.
* Charles Wilson wrote on Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 07:32:12AM CET:
>
> ../../libtool-HEAD/tests/subproject.at:56: $MAKE all $tst_dist
> + make all dist
[...]
> mkdir: cannot create directory
> `/usr/src/libtool/cvs/_build/tests/testsuite.dir/33/subproject-demo
Hello Charles,
Here's a review based on the question how such a concept could be
expressed portably. I don't see how something like this would be of
great help if it could not be made to gracefully decay into something
still usable, on at least a useful set of platforms if not all of them.
* Cha
Charles Wilson wrote:
I completely understand the motivation for the meat of this, speaking in
the hypothetical sense, but why would you ever want to build libbfd
shared?
I did --enable-shared at the top level, and bfd is the first one that
failed. I'm really more interested in the runtime li
Hi Lucien,
Please keep the relevant lists in the Cc: list for the benefit of other
users experiencing the same problem.
On 26 Mar 2007, at 12:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting "Gary V. Vaughan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 25 Mar 2007, at 16:50, Lucien GENTIS wrote:
That means:
CURRENT is repla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 03:42:54PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
> but why would you ever want to build libbfd shared? It is always
> built static by default even on ELF systems
Hmm, not on my system. It's shared here. And a good thing too, as I
don'
Hi Lucien,
On 25 Mar 2007, at 16:50, Lucien GENTIS wrote:
That means:
CURRENT is replaced by CURRENT - AGE (69 - 38 = 31)
REVISION is replaced by AGE
AGE is replaced by REVISION
http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual.html#Libtool-versioning
Cheers,
Gary
--
())_.
10 matches
Mail list logo
