On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 17:11 +0200, Roland Levillain wrote:
> What do you people from Libtool and Ruby think about the behaviors of
> Libtool and Ruby? Should libtool create `.bundle' files on
> Mac OS X/Darwin? Or should ruby accept to load `.so' files as valid
> dynamic modules on this OS?
>
>
Hello,
I'm a happy user of Libtool and Ruby, and I'm using them both in
several projects, together with the Simplified Wrapper and Interface
Generator (SWIG). Everything works well under GNU/Linux, but things
get a little bit harder on Mac OS X, and I'm posting this message on
the Libtool and Rub
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Christopher Faylor on 6/4/2006 5:38 PM:
>
> I've added a libdl.a to the latest snapshot, however any project which
> relies on the existence of this library without checking to see if it
> exists is broken as far as portability is concern
