Hi Bruce,
* Bruce Korb wrote on Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 10:53:44PM CEST:
> On 4/26/06, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Currently the libtool mailing lists employ first-post moderation for
> > nonmembers. When such a moderation request occurs, the list software
> > sends a message
Can the "backscatter" be suppressed only for forged headers?
i.e. email coming from an IP address different from that of the
apparent sender? Otherwise, silence for the neophytes is better thansuppression for the larger audiences. This is awful. :( - Bruce
On 4/26/06, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL P
Hi Robert,
* Robert Szeleney wrote on Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 05:05:22PM CEST:
>
> Finally it looks like that libtool is working.
Great.
> Is it possible that a lot of packages which actually don't have undefined
> symbols in the resulting shared library don't set this flag at all?
> One of these
Hi!
Finally it looks like that libtool is
working.
I can now successfully compile cairo-1.0.2,
fontconf-2.3.93, libxml2-2.6.23, and a few more to shared libraries.
Though I have one question regarding
the -no-undefined flag.
Is it possible that a lot of packages
which actually don't have und
Currently the libtool mailing lists employ first-post moderation for
nonmembers. When such a moderation request occurs, the list software
sends a message to the poster that her message is being held back for
moderation.
For genuine posters, this may be helpful: they are informed about what
happen
