[ Let's move this to libtool-patches
Note also the list server may not come back up for a few days. ]
Hi Pierre,
Sorry for the delay.
* Pierre Ossman wrote on Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 05:30:22PM CET:
> I've put together a suggestion (against 1.5 branch, but the difference
> shouldn't be that big
Olly Betts wrote:
Does the cygwin packaging chooser have the concept of dependencies?
Yes.
I've only used it briefly once some time ago, and I can't remember
much about it. But if it does, then libtool should really depend on
file.
The official libtool package for cygwin (e.g. the one you
On 2006-02-24, Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Olly Betts wrote:
>> I've only used it briefly once some time ago, and I can't remember
>> much about it. But if it does, then libtool should really depend on
>> file.
>
> The official libtool package for cygwin (e.g. the one you get if yo
Olly Betts wrote:
> I don't think there's an obvious dependency cygwin could add to help
> this (unless perhaps something rather arbitrary like making 'make'
> depend on 'file'). So libtool (or rather packages it generates)
> probably does need to cope with file not being installed (or perhaps
>
