Re: Preloading without .la

2006-03-02 Thread Pierre Ossman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: [ Let's move this to libtool-patches Note also the list server may not come back up for a few days. ] Major breakage? Hi Pierre, Sorry for the delay. No problem. * Pierre Ossman wrote on Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 05:30:22PM CET: I've put together a suggestion (again

Re: RPATH on x86_64?

2006-03-02 Thread Pierre Ossman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: In theory: no run paths for paths that the runtime linker searches by default. Otherwise, rpaths for all libraries we link directly against. (Omitting the minor detail that we care about the difference of uninstalled vs. installed locations, for simplicity.) If I read

Re: RPATH on x86_64?

2006-03-02 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Pierre, * Pierre Ossman wrote on Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 09:15:34AM CET: > > I've noticed that when I do a build on x86_64, RPATH gets set in the > binaries. This does not happen when I build on x86, so it seems it's > libtool (perhaps as a result of autoconf, but still) that decides to do > t