Hi Bob,
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 05:39:02AM CET:
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Albert Chin wrote:
> >>
> >>Good. GCC uses -B to mean something else. So -Bstatic is a
> >>linker-only option. It is likely useful to use something new which
> >>won't be confusing due the different me
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Albert Chin wrote:
Good. GCC uses -B to mean something else. So -Bstatic is a
linker-only option. It is likely useful to use something new which
won't be confusing due the different meaning between GCC and ld.
How about -static-only and -shared-only?
Note though that Ra
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 05:40:51PM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Albert Chin wrote:
> >
> >Fine. -Bstatic on Linux means "Do not link against shared libraries."
> >anyway.
>
> Good. GCC uses -B to mean something else. So -Bstatic is a
> linker-only option. It is likely us
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Albert Chin wrote:
Fine. -Bstatic on Linux means "Do not link against shared libraries."
anyway.
Good. GCC uses -B to mean something else. So -Bstatic is a
linker-only option. It is likely useful to use something new which
won't be confusing due the different meaning b
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 12:47:51AM -0600, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Albert Chin wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:28:52PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >>- Should the corresponding libtool flags be named `-Bstatic' resp.
> >> `-Bdynamic'? Those were the most common nam
