Re: HP-UX hppa64 and gcc

2006-01-05 Thread Albert Chin
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 02:03:49PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Albert Chin wrote on Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:49:35PM CET: > > We can ditch hardcode_libdir_flag_spec_ld for HP-UX. > > In the C++ case, yes, but for some HP-UX cases we use $LD still. > Wouldn't a better fix be something like thi

Re: HP-UX hppa64 and gcc

2006-01-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Roger, Albert, * Albert Chin wrote on Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 11:49:35PM CET: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:19:27AM +0100, Roger While wrote: > > Libtool 1.5.22 > > There is a problem on HP-UX 64 bit when using gcc. > > Problem is at line 3167 in libtool.m4 : > > _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_libd

Re: HP-UX hppa64 and gcc

2006-01-05 Thread Roger While
OK. So what should this area of code look like ? (ie. What's with the export dynamic) : Starting at line 3160 hpux10*|hpux11*) if test $with_gnu_ld = no; then _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_libdir_flag_spec, $1)='${wl}+b ${wl}$libdir' _LT_AC_TAGVAR(hardcode_libdir_separator, $1)=:

Re: lt_dlopen with modules and no .la

2006-01-05 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Pierre, * Pierre Ossman wrote on Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:45:11AM CET: > Pierre Ossman wrote: > >Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > > > >>What happens if the path specified by 'base_name' does not include a > >>'.'? Does it crash? > > > >Good point. It should be surrounded by an 'if (ext)'. HEAD also s