Re: lt_dlopen with modules and no .la

2005-12-28 Thread Pierre Ossman
Bob Friesenhahn wrote: What happens if the path specified by 'base_name' does not include a '.'? Does it crash? Good point. It should be surrounded by an 'if (ext)'. Note that the code in development libtool is quite different than the ltdl.c you used. I'm using 1.5.20 here. That was t

adapting for use with TCC

2005-12-28 Thread Edward Chernenko
Hi, my system is LFS/Linux, C compiler TCC 0.9.23 and I'm using > GNU libtool 1.5.22 (1.1220.2.365 2005/12/18 22:14:06) This compiler have no support for '-soname' linker option. I advise you to include the check for such a compiler feature into the libtool configure macro. Edward.

In need of some libtool/autoconf help

2005-12-28 Thread Jim Keller
I'm new to autoconf and libtool, and I'm trying to build some existing libraries into my project. (For those who might be familiar with them, I'm trying to use libmaildir from courier-imap, so that I don't have to write the maildir++ routines myself). However, I'm running into some difficulty,

Re: lt_dlopen with modules and no .la

2005-12-28 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
What happens if the path specified by 'base_name' does not include a '.'? Does it crash? Note that the code in development libtool is quite different than the ltdl.c you used. Bob On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Pierre Ossman wrote: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Pierre, * Pierre Ossman wrote on Thu, D

Re: lt_dlopen with modules and no .la

2005-12-28 Thread Pierre Ossman
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Pierre, * Pierre Ossman wrote on Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 09:26:02AM CET: On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Pierre Ossman wrote: When using ltdl on Windows to load plug-ins there is a problem with the name mangling system. The info.name field is only set if libltdl finds a .la fil

Re: lt_dlopen with modules and no .la

2005-12-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Pierre, * Pierre Ossman wrote on Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 09:26:02AM CET: > >>On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Pierre Ossman wrote: > >> > >>>When using ltdl on Windows to load plug-ins there is a problem with the > >>>name mangling system. The info.name field is only set if libltdl finds a > >>>.la file. Ju