On Wednesday 30 November 2005 03:22 pm, Bruce Korb wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > libtool: install: warning: remember to run \
> > `libtool --finish /home/bkorb/ag/ag/autogen-5.8pre7/_inst/lib'
>
> Warnings are generally for the purpose of alerting people to the fact
> that something correctable leaves th
Hi,
> libtool: install: warning: remember to run \
> `libtool --finish /home/bkorb/ag/ag/autogen-5.8pre7/_inst/lib'
Warnings are generally for the purpose of alerting people to the fact
that something correctable leaves the opportunity for errors or
hidden problems. The string, "warning" draws
Dear Ralf,
You wrote:
> We need RTLD_GLOBAL by default at the moment, simply because some
> libltdl users expect things to work this way. We could add a new
> interface which allows some kind of localization of symbol scope,
> say lt_dlopen_mode("foo.la", LT_DL_LOCAL), but what about graceful
> de
* Paul Jakma wrote on Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 07:10:30PM CET:
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> >see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-06/msg00145.html ). Or,
> >to not avoid further namespace invasion, maybe `-DPIC -DLT_PIE'.
> >For CC and CXX tags? Suggestions? Maybe only a
Hi Paul,
* Paul Jakma wrote on Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:13:14PM CET:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> >PIE and PIC arent the same thing
> The distinction between the two is mostly important at link-time. Ie
> a collection of PIC and/or PIE objects can be linked together into a
>
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote:
PIE and PIC arent the same thing
-fPIC is for creating position independent code for shared objects
while -fPIE is for creating position independent code for executables
Right, I did know that ;).
The distinction between the two is mostly important
Hi,
Mike Frysinger wrote:
I don't know, but PIE and PIC don't compile to same thing AFAICT. I
don't know the significance of that though.
IIRC -pie is only a linker flag that
a) affects selection of the linker script
b) disallows certain relocation types
c) notes the position-independence
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 06:10:30PM +, Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> >This seems to me the superior solution. Thus, let's kill the
> >--with-pic idea, too. It won't get us over main.o
> >compiled-without-libtool and neither one of -fpic or -fpie in
> >
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
This seems to me the superior solution. Thus, let's kill the
--with-pic idea, too. It won't get us over main.o
compiled-without-libtool and neither one of -fpic or -fpie in
CFLAGS anyway. And I can't see why it should be more useful to
have two P
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 07:57:00PM CET:
>
> My tests with gcc-3.4.4 show that -fpie/-fPIE always override
> -fpic/-fPIC, independent of the order in which they were passed.
> (What an unfortunate choice, by the way. Oh well.)
This is http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c
10 matches
Mail list logo
