Re: 1.5.18: suppressing non-C language checks / pass flags to cc in link mode

2005-11-28 Thread Paul Jakma
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Nono. You are missing the fact that Autoconf will put this in @DEFS@ if AC_CONFIG_HEADERS has not been used. Ah! :) Surely noone would pass those to a link command, right? ;-) (I mean even if they don't use Automake.) Hehe, hope not! ;) You ar

Re: libtool "no symlinked libs" patch

2005-11-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Jacob Meuser wrote on Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 05:19:44AM CET: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 12:15:09AM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > | 1) Move all paths to uninstalled libraries (in the correct order) before > > the patch does put them in the order they are encountere

Re: 1.5.18: suppressing non-C language checks / pass flags to cc in link mode

2005-11-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Paul, * Paul Jakma wrote on Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 05:01:26AM CET: > On Sun, 27 Nov 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > >As in > >-DPACKAGE_STRING=\"foo\ 0.1\" > >for example? Granted, I don't know of so many linker flags which need > >this. > > Ouch, that's fairly nasty. If someone wants to do t

Re: libtool "no symlinked libs" patch

2005-11-28 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 12:15:09AM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > | The way I see it, there are two possible ways out: > | > | 1) Move all paths to uninstalled libraries (in the correct order) before the patch does pu

Re: 1.5.18: suppressing non-C language checks / pass flags to cc in link mode

2005-11-28 Thread Paul Jakma
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: I hoped you would not say that.. ;-) :). It's a bad header. It's described slightly differently by DJB and an old DRUMS draft. Of the MUAs which interpret it, their actions seems to differ. Those MUAs should stop supporting it really. Anyway, a m

Re: Implementing LIBTOOL on OpenVMS

2005-11-28 Thread John E. Malmberg
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * John E. Malmberg wrote on Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:26:14PM CET: Because of differences between *NIX and OpenVMS in this area, it looks like it may not be possible to make generating shared images on OpenVMS totally transparent to a build procedure with out some coopera

Re: libtool "no symlinked libs" patch

2005-11-28 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Wildenhues wrote: | The way I see it, there are two possible ways out: | | 1) Move all paths to uninstalled libraries (in the correct order) before | all other path specs. This is pretty much in the spirit of the patch | you posted in the other

Re: Problem with libtool under HPUX: BIND_FIRST flag is required

2005-11-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Jan, * Jan Giesen wrote on Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 10:56:26PM CET: > > The trigger libraries are itself loaded explicitly with lt_dlopen(), but not > in the main programm, but in a another shared library, which is implicit > loaded from the main program. > To access a trigger library a pointer to

Re: libtool "no symlinked libs" patch

2005-11-28 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Jacob, * Jacob Meuser wrote on Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:03:56AM CET: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 09:06:09AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > > Libtool knows that the library is uninstalled, because this information > > is encoded in libbar.la > > yes, it winds up in $notinst_path. I disconve