Re: HEAD build failure, just me?

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 05:36:50PM CET: * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 03:29:24PM CET: cd . && /bin/sh ./config.status libtool config.status: executing libtool commands cp ../libtool/libltdl/argz_.h libltdl/argz.h-t cp: cannot cre

Re: HEAD build failure, just me?

* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 05:36:50PM CET: > * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 03:29:24PM CET: > > cd . && /bin/sh ./config.status libtool > > config.status: executing libtool commands > > cp ../libtool/libltdl/argz_.h libltdl/argz.h-t > > cp: cannot create regular

Re: HEAD build failure, just me?

Hi Peter, * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 03:29:24PM CET: > cd . && /bin/sh ./config.status libtool > config.status: executing libtool commands > cp ../libtool/libltdl/argz_.h libltdl/argz.h-t > cp: cannot create regular file `libltdl/argz.h-t': No such file or directory > make: ***

Re: HEAD build failure, just me?

Peter O'Gorman wrote: cd . && /bin/sh ./config.status libtool config.status: executing libtool commands cp ../libtool/libltdl/argz_.h libltdl/argz.h-t cp: cannot create regular file `libltdl/argz.h-t': No such file or directory make: *** [libltdl/argz.h] Error 1 For a VPATH build in an empty d

HEAD build failure, just me?

cd . && /bin/sh ./config.status libtool config.status: executing libtool commands cp ../libtool/libltdl/argz_.h libltdl/argz.h-t cp: cannot create regular file `libltdl/argz.h-t': No such file or directory make: *** [libltdl/argz.h] Error 1 For a VPATH build in an empty dir. creating the libltdl

Re: response file support in GCC

Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 02:49:25PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > >Erm. We have -objectlist. I have yet to see a different need for > >response file semantics in libtool. > > Too many -D/-I options... I'm sure there are others. config.h exists for the form

Re: response file support in GCC

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 01:57:00PM CET: Ralf Wildenhues wrote: With response file support in GCC [1] we need to adjust Libtool accordingly. Minimally to let the option through as below, but ideally we should probably parse its contents

Re: response file support in GCC

Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 01:57:00PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >With response file support in GCC [1] we need to adjust Libtool > >accordingly. Minimally to let the option through as below, but > >ideally we should probably parse its contents. > > The spec sa

Re: response file support in GCC

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Wildenhues wrote: | With response file support in GCC [1] we need to adjust Libtool | accordingly. Minimally to let the option through as below, but | ideally we should probably parse its contents. | | Any volunteers? Comments? | This is fine.

Re: response file support in GCC

Ralf Wildenhues wrote: With response file support in GCC [1] we need to adjust Libtool accordingly. Minimally to let the option through as below, but ideally we should probably parse its contents. The spec says that the file must contain whitespace separated arguments, so parsing should be a c

response file support in GCC

With response file support in GCC [1] we need to adjust Libtool accordingly. Minimally to let the option through as below, but ideally we should probably parse its contents. Any volunteers? Comments? Cheers, Ralf [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg01700.html Index: ltmain.in ===