Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 06:43:43AM -0700, Ed Hartnett wrote:
>> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I forgot one thing: If you're trying to use libtool with the FC (Fortran
>> > 90/95) interface, you are likely to have to go through hoops
Hi Ed,
* Ed Hartnett wrote on Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 02:43:43PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I forgot one thing: If you're trying to use libtool with the FC (Fortran
> > 90/95) interface, you are likely to have to go through hoops with
> > libtool-1.5.x, since it doesn't
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 06:43:43AM -0700, Ed Hartnett wrote:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I forgot one thing: If you're trying to use libtool with the FC (Fortran
> > 90/95) interface, you are likely to have to go through hoops with
> > libtool-1.5.x, since it doesn't suppor
Hi, I'm using autoconf/automake to build 2 modules (xxx_la_LDFLAGS =
-avoid-version -module), lets call
them foo.la and bar.la. The problem I'm having is that bar.la uses
symbols from foo.la, so I need to link bar.la
with foo.la, but this is not portable according to libtool. If I do run
"make"
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I forgot one thing: If you're trying to use libtool with the FC (Fortran
> 90/95) interface, you are likely to have to go through hoops with
> libtool-1.5.x, since it doesn't support it. Current CVS Libtool, which
> will hopefully soon be Libtool-2.0,
