* Tim Rice wrote on Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 10:10:04PM CET:
>
> Is it intentional that the new test suite only gets run
> if the old test suite passes?
Unfortunate limitation which noone has yet bothered to fix.
make check TESTSUITE_FLAGS=-V
make check TESTS=
runs one without the other. A fix w
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 12:10:23PM -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
> Albert Chin wrote:
> > [snip ...]
> >
> >Dynamic module support in openldap-2.3.x isn't working on AIX for the
> >above reason. Using -bexpall or -bE when linking the main binary does
> >work though. While the main binary, slapd, doesn't
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 12:16:01PM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:56:30AM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:14:14AM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> > > [snip ...]
> > >
> > > This means the method libtool uses to support -dlopen self on AIX
> > > won't wo
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Tim Rice wrote:
> .
> 13. old-m4-iface.at:34: testing ...
> libtoolize: linking file `./config.guess'
> libtoolize: linking file `./config.sub'
> libtoolize: linking file `./install-sh'
> libtoolize: linking file `./ltmain.sh'
> libtoolize: You should add the contents of
>
.
13. old-m4-iface.at:34: testing ...
libtoolize: linking file `./config.guess'
libtoolize: linking file `./config.sub'
libtoolize: linking file `./install-sh'
libtoolize: linking file `./ltmain.sh'
libtoolize: You should add the contents of
`/opt/src/gnu/libtool-2.x/libltdl/m4/libtool.m4' to
Albert Chin wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:38:26AM -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
Albert Chin wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:14:14AM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
[snip ...]
This means the method libtool uses to support -dlopen self on AIX
won't work (by building a list of symbols into some xxS.o
Is it intentional that the new test suite only gets run
if the old test suite passes?
--
Tim RiceMultitalents(707) 887-1469
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:38:26AM -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
> Albert Chin wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:14:14AM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> >>[snip ...]
> >>
> >>This means the method libtool uses to support -dlopen self on AIX
> >>won't work (by building a list of symbols into some xxS.o fi
Albert Chin wrote:
On AIX, ld doesn't explicitly export all symbols (not even with
-bexpall). From ld(1):
autoexp
Automatically exports some symbols from the output module without
having to list them in an export file. (This option does not
export all symbols from the outpu
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Albert Chin wrote:
Seems the openldap folks should really use -export-dynamic, which
isn't defined for AIX. We could make it -bexpall but as documented in
the previous mail, it doesn't export everything. So, should we create
a new variable, export_dyn
Albert Chin wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:14:14AM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
[snip ...]
This means the method libtool uses to support -dlopen self on AIX
won't work (by building a list of symbols into some xxS.o file and
linking it with the executable). The real solution is to -bE the
symbol
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
However, I guess some readers of this list might be annoyed by large
messages as yours. First, please take my apology: we have moderation
turned on for messages >100KB, still I just allowed it through while my
mind was somewhere else. Second, Christian, it would be nice i
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Albert Chin wrote:
Seems the openldap folks should really use -export-dynamic, which
isn't defined for AIX. We could make it -bexpall but as documented in
the previous mail, it doesn't export everything. So, should we create
a new variable, export_dynamic_cmds? If so, and te
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:56:30AM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:14:14AM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> > [snip ...]
> >
> > This means the method libtool uses to support -dlopen self on AIX
> > won't work (by building a list of symbols into some xxS.o file and
> > linking it
Hi Christian,
* Christian Biesinger wrote on Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 05:59:03PM CET:
> Hi again, and sorry for the late reply. I did, unfortunately, not have
> time to do this earlier...
That is no problem at all.
However, I guess some readers of this list might be annoyed by large
messages as you
On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:14:14AM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
> [snip ...]
>
> This means the method libtool uses to support -dlopen self on AIX
> won't work (by building a list of symbols into some xxS.o file and
> linking it with the executable). The real solution is to -bE the
> symbol list. Wha
On AIX, ld doesn't explicitly export all symbols (not even with
-bexpall). From ld(1):
autoexp
Automatically exports some symbols from the output module without
having to list them in an export file. (This option does not
export all symbols from the output module. Use the -be
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
By the way: does BeOS need the "lib" prefix for modules at all?
To test a hypothetical "no" answer, I think this should work:
configure
$EDITOR ./libtool # set need_lib_prefix=no
make check TESTS='tests/mdemo-shared.test'
This passed (HEAD; I interrupted the testsu
Hi Tim,
* Tim Rice wrote on Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 11:19:30AM CET:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Tim Rice wrote on Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 02:34:18AM CET:
> > >
> > > --- automake-1.9.6/automake.in.old2005-06-30 14:17:13.0
> > > -0700
> > > +++ automake-1.9.6/aut
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> * Tim Rice wrote on Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 02:34:18AM CET:
> > On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > I guess you should be able to use this manually-written rule as a
> > > workaround:
> > >
> > > .cpp.$(OBJEXT):
> > > $
Hi Tim,
* Tim Rice wrote on Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 02:34:18AM CET:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > I guess you should be able to use this manually-written rule as a
> > workaround:
> >
> > .cpp.$(OBJEXT):
> > $(CXXCOMPILE) -c $<
>
> Or this patch to automake
> ..
> --
21 matches
Mail list logo
