Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Please post tests/testsuite.log containing the failures (packed?).
I cannot reproduce this on GNU/Linux (and you posting should be less
work than me trying to reproduce it on cygwin :)
attached.
--
Chuck
testsuite.log.bz2
Description: Binary data
_
In regard to: Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?,...:
I'm talking about a situation like this:
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link cxx -some_compiler_flags -o
libfoo.la -rpath /path/to/lib -version-info 16:3:1 -no-undefined foo.lo
bar.lo baz.lo /path/to/lib/libdep.so
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 11:20:43AM -0500, Tim Mooney wrote:
> In regard to: Re: mode=link and full path to dependent shared library?,...:
>
> I more or less stumbled on this by accident, and was just trying to
> understand why libtool was removing the shared library that was specified
> by path.
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 05:46:48PM -0500, Tim Mooney wrote:
>
> Can someone point me to the place in the docs that explains libtool's
> handling of --mode=link when a dependent shared library is specified by
> full path? I'm having trouble finding it.
>
> I'm talking about a situation like this:
Hi Christian,
* Christian Biesinger wrote on Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 08:51:32PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >branch-2-0 is dead, 2.0 will be released from what is now CVS HEAD.
> Ah, thank you for the checkins. The 2.0 branch status is somewhat
> unclear on the webpage, which says:
*snip*
> Th
