Re: Support for creating shared C++ libraries on BeOS

2005-10-08 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Christian, * Christian Biesinger wrote on Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 03:41:42AM CEST: > Hi, > the attached patch fixes (implements) C++ support for shared libraries > on BeOS. It just copies the C part to the C++ section; this works fine, > I tested on Zeta. Thank you for the patch! > The patch w

Re: libtool-HEAD, 20051007, cygwin

2005-10-08 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Charles, * Charles Wilson wrote on Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 07:28:52PM CEST: > I ran into an oddity with 'make dist' recently: > > I bootstrapped, compiled, and ran the testsuite[*] on libtool cvs HEAD > and got the expected results (see attached). I then did a 'make dist' > (after hand-editing

Support for creating shared C++ libraries on BeOS

2005-10-08 Thread Christian Biesinger
Hi, the attached patch fixes (implements) C++ support for shared libraries on BeOS. It just copies the C part to the C++ section; this works fine, I tested on Zeta. The patch was made against libtool 1.5.16; it seems to apply to 1.5.20 as well. Would be great if you could check it in. Looki

libtool-HEAD, 20051007, cygwin

2005-10-08 Thread Charles Wilson
I ran into an oddity with 'make dist' recently: I bootstrapped, compiled, and ran the testsuite[*] on libtool cvs HEAD and got the expected results (see attached). I then did a 'make dist' (after hand-editing the top-level Makefile to remove references to fcdemo, as I do not have f90 installe