On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 01:31:37PM +, Olly Betts wrote:
> [Cc:-ed to Mark Espie at Jacob's suggestion:
> > I think perhaps you should ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this. he might
> > be able to explain why -lstdc++ is not implicitly used in `g++ -shared'
>
> If you need context, this is the who
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> * Tim Rice wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 07:56:31PM CEST:
> > I'd like to be able have the embedded runpath be /opt/lib even
> > if I install in /opt/foo/lib. (the package posinstall script would put
> > symbolic links in /opt/lib)
>
> I
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Assuming you don't need recursion, here's a thought. Use "local", but
> stick to the convention that all variable names are unique. On
> systems that don't support "local", define a function named "local"
> that warns if any of its arguments is a variabl
Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Assuming you don't need recursion, here's a thought. Use "local", but
>> stick to the convention that all variable names are unique. On
>> systems that don't support "local", define a function named "local"
Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now that there are no doubts about the portability of shell functions
> (in the sense that there's always a shell on the machine that supports
> function ---and maybe the documentation should reflect this),
Yes, it should.
> I'm curious about the suppo
Hi Tim,
* Tim Rice wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 07:56:31PM CEST:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Howard Chu wrote:
>
> > First of all, my objective - other folks may have their own objectives
> > different than this: Build a suite of software that uses shared libraries,
> > such that any embedded runpath
Hi Enrico,
* Enrico Weigelt wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 03:27:21PM CEST:
> * Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > how does libtool decide whether to link against an .la library
> > > dynamically vs. statically ?
> >
> > For a program or a library? Uninstalled or installed librar
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Howard Chu wrote:
> First of all, my objective - other folks may have their own objectives
> different than this: Build a suite of software that uses shared libraries,
> such that any embedded runpaths only reflect the ultimate install path (e.g.
> /opt/foo/lib) and not any of
Hi Howard,
* Howard Chu wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 12:01:22PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >We have better support for sysroot and/or DESTDIR on our TODO list.
> >Why don't you help us improve and fix libtool? That is bound to be
> >a lot less work.
> >http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/li
Hi,
After reading a recent thread on `guile-user', it occurred to me that
`lt_dlopenext ()' doesn't allow to pass information about the version of
a module that is requested.
This is quite unfortunate, especially for Guile, since Guile modules
load C libraries using `dynamic-link' which is roughl
On 2005-09-22, Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do we know what the versions of the OS/gcc are where -lstdc++ is missing? We
> can enplicitly add it (as we did recently for, I think, sunpro c++). Is this
> a gcc bug, or is it by design?
I've only been able to test OpenBSD 3.7 with g++ 3
[Cc:-ed to Mark Espie at Jacob's suggestion:
> I think perhaps you should ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this. he might
> be able to explain why -lstdc++ is not implicitly used in `g++ -shared'
If you need context, this is the whole thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general/6671
* Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > how does libtool decide whether to link against an .la library
> > dynamically vs. statically ?
>
> For a program or a library? Uninstalled or installed library
> (see recent bug report of Howard Chu)?
Each of these cases ...
I've now fig
Now that there are no doubts about the portability of shell functions
(in the sense that there's always a shell on the machine that supports
function ---and maybe the documentation should reflect this), I'm
curious about the support of "return" and "local". Is there anything
known about them? IS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jacob Meuser wrote:
| I think perhaps you should ask [EMAIL PROTECTED] about this. he might
| be able to explain why -lstdc++ is not implicitly used in `g++ -shared',
| which could give you a good starting point on how to "fix" the
| "problem".
|
I
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
We have better support for sysroot and/or DESTDIR on our TODO list.
Why don't you help us improve and fix libtool? That is bound to be
a lot less work.
*time passes*
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2005-06/msg00161.html
Oh, you asked before. Why not r
Hi Enrico,
* Enrico Weigelt wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:56:27PM CEST:
>
> how does libtool decide whether to link against an .la library
> dynamically vs. statically ?
For a program or a library? Uninstalled or installed library
(see recent bug report of Howard Chu)? On a system with bot
17 matches
Mail list logo
