Re: Fwd: Configure is checking for fortran yet I have no fortran code or checks

2005-09-23 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 23 September 2005 06:50 pm, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > | the CXX check is especially annoying ... if you have a host which only > | has a C > | compiler and you try to build a library which is pure C, configure will > | abort because it cant find a C++ compiler even t

Re: Fwd: Configure is checking for fortran yet I have no fortran code or checks

2005-09-23 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: | the CXX check is especially annoying ... if you have a host which only has a C | compiler and you try to build a library which is pure C, configure will abort | because it cant find a C++ compiler even though none of the source

Re: Fwd: Configure is checking for fortran yet I have no fortran code or checks

2005-09-23 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 23 September 2005 11:49 am, Brian wrote: > http://cvs.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/common/m4/as-libtool-tags.m4?rev=1.2&v >iew=markup > > http://cvs.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/configure.ac?r1=1.373&r2=1.3 >74 i wish that libtool tag patch was added to the official libtool package :

Re: Calling AC_CONFIG_HEADERS from LT_INIT?

2005-09-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 06:17:48PM CEST: > > I think this represents a thinko in the way LT_INIT decides > whether to call AC_CONFIG_HEADERS, but I'm not sure I follow > what the intention is supposed to be. Could you enlighten me? Well, it was you that introduc

Calling AC_CONFIG_HEADERS from LT_INIT?

2005-09-23 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hallo Ralf, I think this represents a thinko in the way LT_INIT decides whether to call AC_CONFIG_HEADERS, but I'm not sure I follow what the intention is supposed to be. Could you enlighten me? $ rm -rf foo && mkdir foo && cd foo $ cat >configure.ac

Fwd: Configure is checking for fortran yet I have no fortran code or checks

2005-09-23 Thread Brian
Sent for archive purposes. Thanks for the help. -- Forwarded message -- From: Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]box.com>Date: Sep 23, 2005 9:04 AMSubject: Configure is checking for fortran yet I have no fortran code or checks To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Hey dude, I'm not on the libtool list,

Re: postdeps empty on OpenBSD

2005-09-23 Thread Peter O'Gorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jacob Meuser wrote: | | just add -lstdc++ manually. trust me, that works fine. I really don't | see why libtool should be adding this automatically. is it _always_ | needed? what about -lsupc++? | Apparently, it is not always needed, see:

Re: postdeps empty on OpenBSD

2005-09-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ By the way, I don't think everyone in this discussion has subscribed this list; if in doubt, speak up, or even better, set Mail-Followup-To: next time ] * Jacob Meuser wrote on Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 04:10:36AM CEST: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 08:41:38AM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote: > > Jacob Meuse

Re: regarding multiple parser.y in single Makefile.am

2005-09-23 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Nitesh Soni (NC/TNT) wrote: I have parser.y in src/libX/src and in src/libY/src ... I have a single Makefile.am at "src" level. How can I build these 2 parser.y in the single Makefile.am for these two different libraries.. configure.ac: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([subdir-objects]) Makefile.