Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD

2005-08-22 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Albert Chin wrote on Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 04:41:58AM CEST: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 07:54:59PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > > Ralf Wildenhues wrote on libtool-patches: > > >I kept quiet a while ago when Bob first suggested ditching the CVS > > >branch-2-0 and releasing CVS HEAD as 2.0 after a

Re: Call for help: Solaris C++ and Sun CC

2005-08-22 Thread Albert Chin
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 03:46:13PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > So I looked around. I've found this documentation > http://docs-pdf.sun.com/806-7982/806-7982.pdf (page 21): > > | The Sun WorkShop 6 update 2 C++ compiler (5.3) includes a shared > | version of the libCstd library. > | To use the

Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD

2005-08-22 Thread Albert Chin
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 07:54:59PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > [Moved to libtool list] > > Ralf Wildenhues wrote on libtool-patches: > >I kept quiet a while ago when Bob first suggested ditching the CVS > >branch-2-0 and releasing CVS HEAD as 2.0 after a bit of stabilization. > >Now I estimate

Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD

2005-08-22 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hallo Ralf, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 08:54:59PM CEST: Ralf Wildenhues wrote on libtool-patches: I kept quiet a while ago when Bob first suggested ditching the CVS branch-2-0 and releasing CVS HEAD as 2.0 after a bit of stabilization. The only

Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD

2005-08-22 Thread Noah Misch
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 07:54:59PM +0100, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > [1] Autoconf-2.60 needs M4-2.0 needs Libtool-2.0 (ISTR that For what does Autoconf need M4 2.0? ___ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD

2005-08-22 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Gary, * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 08:54:59PM CEST: > [Moved to libtool list] Thanks. > Ralf Wildenhues wrote on libtool-patches: > >I kept quiet a while ago when Bob first suggested ditching the CVS > >branch-2-0 and releasing CVS HEAD as 2.0 after a bit of stabilization.

Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD

2005-08-22 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
[Moved to libtool list] Ralf Wildenhues wrote on libtool-patches: I kept quiet a while ago when Bob first suggested ditching the CVS branch-2-0 and releasing CVS HEAD as 2.0 after a bit of stabilization. Now I estimate that, for us combined, it might save us a man month (whoohoo, maybe even a my

Re: Documentation patch

2005-08-22 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 11:03:31AM CEST: > > First, please always send patches in unified diff format (option `-d' Argl. That option should've been `-u', of course. > for diff, or just put the line `diff -u' in ~/.cvsrc). That way, they > can be applied also to slightly