I have devised a test for this. More near the bottom, in the
appropriate context.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Ralf Wildenhues writes:
>Hi Tom,
>
>* tom fogal wrote on Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 04:58:50PM CEST:
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Ralf Wildenhues writes:
>>
>> >list. From your response below (you stated th
Hi Tom,
* tom fogal wrote on Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 04:58:50PM CEST:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Ralf Wildenhues writes:
>
> >list. From your response below (you stated that you did not need
> >libtool after all), I gathered that this bug report is not so urgent
> >resp. that without using libtool thin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Ralf Wildenhues writes:
>Hi Tom,
>
>Sorry for the high response latency. I saw your post on the automake
Oh, no worries.
>list. From your response below (you stated that you did not need
>libtool after all), I gathered that this bug report is not so urgent
>resp. that witho
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 04:12:08PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> | Proposed patch OK for branch-1-5? Unfortunately, the forward ports will
> | need more work.
>
> Looks good to me.
Applied. (I somehow forgot to do this right away.)
Cheers,
Ralf
_
Hi Tom,
Sorry for the high response latency. I saw your post on the automake
list. From your response below (you stated that you did not need
libtool after all), I gathered that this bug report is not so urgent
resp. that without using libtool things would work for you. More below.
* tom foga
