On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 15:13 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Keith, others,
>
> Sorry for the response latency. This is a status update for the -sobase
> patch: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2005-07/msg00093.html.
Thanks for your response and your work on this matter.
> Your patch
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 09:41:45AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > I have no idea what the intention of this test really is that
> > isn't covered by the other test, so I don't have a suggestion on
> > how to fix it.
>
> Did this help?
Yes it did.
> BTW, will you be maintaining the Debian Libt
Hi Keith, others,
Sorry for the response latency. This is a status update for the -sobase
patch: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2005-07/msg00093.html.
* Keith Packard wrote on Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 09:55:47PM CEST:
> On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 13:58 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > Re-r
Hi Kurt,
Sorry for the late reply. I overlooked your mail the first time.
(Feel free to send reminders if answers take time.)
* Kurt Roeckx wrote on Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 02:06:22PM CEST:
>
> I'm having a few problem with the deplibs.test. It's broken for
> several reasons:
> - It's linking a
