On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Thanks, also to Peter.
I was unsure whether libtoolize should be changed to copy in order as
well (and _not_ preserve time stamps). A `libtoolize --copy --force'
would then assure that copied files are newer than any other files in
the existing source
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 05:19:47PM CEST:
> On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> >OK. Let's just install them in the correct order. libtoolize can still
> >use the `tar' pipe to keep the time stamps on the way from the
> >installatinon dir to the user package so
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
OK. Let's just install them in the correct order. libtoolize can still
use the `tar' pipe to keep the time stamps on the way from the
installatinon dir to the user package source tree.
Proposed patch OK for branch-1-5? Unfortunately, the forward por
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
| Proposed patch OK for branch-1-5? Unfortunately, the forward ports will
| need more work.
Looks good to me.
Thank you!
Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBQvNzuLiDAg3OZTLPAQLewAP8DbG
Hi all,
I have found the reason for libtool linking to the wrong stdc++, the
problem is that I don't know libtool well enough to propose the "right"
solution.
The problem plays out like this:
- The stdc++ library is added to the "postdeps" environment variable, like
this:
postdeps="-lstdc++ -lm
[ This should fix once and for all the issues that have come up with
the changes put in so far for Jeff Squyres' bug report:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2005-02/msg00115.html
and have caused numerous problems in the meantime:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2005-04/msg00
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello everybody,
>
> We (the Libtool developers) are trying to increase the signal to noise
> ratio on the libtool lists (thanks for pushing us to do this!).
>
> So, in addition to the spamassassin-based filtering done by the savannah
> people for all
Hello everybody,
We (the Libtool developers) are trying to increase the signal to noise
ratio on the libtool lists (thanks for pushing us to do this!).
So, in addition to the spamassassin-based filtering done by the savannah
people for all of gnu.org[1], we will now enable moderation for all
non-
